Government requests for data: global

2025 - 2023 2022 - 2020 2019 - 2017 2016 - 2014 2013 - 2011

Requests in the U.S. and globally

Requests by country

2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015

Requests by country and accounts subject to those requests

2024: January-June

  Requests for member data Accounts subject to request(s) [1] Percentage of requests for which LinkedIn provided some data
Accounts for which LinkedIn provided some data [2]
Argentina 9 10 0% 0
Australia 6 22 0% 0
Austria 5 8 20% 1
Belgium 8 19 100% 11
Brazil 25 29 40% 10
Canada
8 9 50% 4
China 1 1 0% 0
Columbia 2 2 0% 0
Costa Rica 1 2 0% 0
France
520 530 30% 158
Georgia 1 1 0% 0%
Germany
126 227 67% 130
Greece 1 1 0% 0
Guatemala 1 1 0% 0
Hong Kong 1 1 0% 0
India
96 119 26% 28
Ireland 8 10 25% 2
Italy
11 12 73% 8
Jordan 2 2 0% 0
Lithuania 2 2 100% 2
Malta 1 1 0% 0
Mexico 6 9 0% 0
Netherlands
12 72 100% 70
Poland 15 34 47% 18
Portugal 3 3 100% 3
Singapore 1 2 0% 0
Spain 21 31 71% 16
Sweden 1 1 100% 1
Switzerland 11 13 18% 2
Turkey 2 2 50% 1
United Kingdom 28 33 61% 17
United States 474 2523 83% 992
Total 1409 3732 53% 1474

[1] This column was previously labeled "Accounts Impacted", but we changed the name to clarify that it reflects the number of accounts subject to the data requests, and not the number of accounts for which some responsive data was in fact provided.


[2] We started reporting the number of accounts for which at least some data was provided in response to government requests in our January-June 2014 Transparency Report.

2024 2023 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014

2024: January-June

Requests [1] 474
Accounts subject to requests 2,523
Requests for which LinkedIn provided some data 83%
Subpoenas [2] 72%
Search warrants [3] 10%
Court orders [4] 17%
Other [5] 1%
National security letters received [6] 0-499
National security letters (accounts subject to request)
0-499
FISA requests [6] 0-499

[1] U.S. Government Requests for Member Data include all requests received by LinkedIn from the U.S. government except for national security-related requests, such as National Security Letters and requests under the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), if any.

[2] Subpoenas may be issued for information that is reasonably relevant to the general subject matter of a pending investigation. They are typically pre-signed by a court clerk and are issued by prosecutors without the involvement of a judge.

[3] Search warrants require the government to demonstrate "probable cause" and are generally issued by a judge. The standard applicable to a search warrant is higher than that applicable to a subpoena.

[4] Court orders vary depending on the circumstances and the issuing court and jurisdiction. Many of the court orders LinkedIn receives are issued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d), a provision of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA). To obtain such an order, the government must demonstrate specific and articulable facts showing that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the information sought is relevant and material to an ongoing investigation. This standard is higher than that applicable to subpoenas but lower than that applicable to search warrants.

[5] The "Other" category includes requests that do not fall within any of the above categories. Examples include emergency requests. As indicated in footnote 1, the category does not include national security-related requests.


[6] In our Government Requests Reports prior to July 2019, we reported on National Security Requests, which could include National Security Letters and FISA requests. In the effort to provide more transparency to our members, we now report NLSs and FISA requests separately. Because we are required by law to delay the release of FISA data by 6 months, reported FISA request metrics correspond to the previous reporting period (for example, data for the July-December 2019 period is reported in our January-June 2020 report).

2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018

By country and action taken

2024: January-June

  Requests Action taken Percentage action taken
Australia 1 1 100%
Brazil 21 11 52%
Canada 1 0 0%
Germany 1 1 100%
India 16 9 56%
Indonesia 5 5 100%
Ireland 1 1 100%
Pakistan 2 2 100%
Switzerland 1 1 100%
Turkey 25 21 84%
United Kingdom 1 1 100%
United States 12 9 75%
Total including the US 87 62 71%
Total minus the US 75 53 71%

• We started reporting on content-related requests in our January 1-June 30, 2018 Transparency Report.


• Government Requests for Content Removal are requests received by LinkedIn from governments seeking the removal of content, including reporting violations of our Terms of Service or violations of local law.